(this page is translated by Google; We're working hard on a human translation)

Texy vs WYSIWYG Editors

WYSIWYG editor displays the document while editing the form in what will be printed, displayed on the Web, etc. An example of such an editor is Word.

This kind of editors experienced in managing Internet content a real boom. Who could resist them visually attractive environment and myšoidnímu control. Thanks to clever programmers components, their implementation was a breeze, and now offers each CMS. In practice, however, shows how their strengths are only apparent.

WYSIWYG Web site is not suitable for

Web site has a quite different specifics than the printed document. While the press is a priority for visual layout (from which derives the structure of the human brain, ie, what is the title, what is text and what is the label image), the site is the foundation of the structure.

The visual editor is actually constantly struggling. First maker fights the administration interface, which is trying to force it to generate usable code. After struggling with the very user who seeks to use the full range of available colors and fonts, create a formidable site. Followed by efforts to trim the editor option, which replaces another user's desire to exploit its full potential.

Current WYSIWYG editors are simply not suited for the web. I declare that the knowledge of the author of several administrative interface to use it. I needed to come up with a more appropriate instrument and thus creating Texy

WYSIWYM

WYSIWYM means What You See Is What You Mean.